+0.5
but i will still upvote it
what i think is that they should give a reasons and place to improve, for example:
Sorry as your application is too short so i will denied your application. Please write longer and list more detail on you @@@part and @@@part.
some scenarios
If i am a admin or a manager, i see some troll application then i will just say denied. Why? you already know why, i dont think i need to explain.
if i see a short application then i may say the sentence 4 line above.
if i see a medium application, then i may say "oh this part is too short, this part is not detail enough, and this part's gramma has messed up" something like this
If i see a long application, bur just need like 1-2 marks then it may evaluate. Then i may say "For the whole application, you did a great job, but there are few place which may cause some mark deduction, for example you wrote too long here, and kinda lost the question, your application is very detailed, but i dont see much experience from you, or some great motivation from you. Keep it up, check your motivation, and make sure you are applying for something, not just for the rank."
As
@Unawarely said, "if you wrote short, then the reply will be short, if you wrote long but get denied, they will give some more reasons to you".
What i think the most important is not the reasons, is the list of suggestion that the admin/ the manager gave you to improve. Improvement is VERY IMPORTANT.
So, except the reasons,
some suggestion/ advice given after the denied reply will be great!
sry i shouldn't write that long, but ye, this is a important thing.
hope you can briefly watch all of it...