Unreasonable mute

[undeaddanny723]

I was muted on October 7 2023 for apparently spam, I sent 1 message 3 times which caused it to be spam. I am unsure of this nonsense that the staff member called spam. I didn't mean to violate any rules and I do not think it should have concluded to a 90 day mute. One offense of so-called spamming shouldnt result to a 90 day mute in the first place. In my opinion the staff had been reasonable to mute me but the duration definitely wasn't reasonable. Besides over a year ago, I had no other violations that could've led to a 90 day mute. Please lift my mute or at least shorten the time

 

[undeaddanny723]

In the pika network rules it states that the first offense results in a warning, but my first offensive resulted in a 90 day mute

 

[xViiRuS]

If you believe your punishment was unfair, appeal HERE.

 

[CreeperDxD]

Well it says 6th offense here
But if you think it was unfair you can appeal
Also read the rules before appealing ,

 

[Bumbrah]

Hello undeaddanny723,

You're punishment is valid.

As you can see in this provided screenshot ^, you had already been muted for 30 days for spamming that is, (5th) offense.
again You again spammed the same message, which caused you to be muted for 90 days for spamming that is, (6th) offense.



For you're reference, here are some important rules. Make sure what is allowed and what is not.

 

[Otherside]

In the pika network rules it states that the first offense results in a warning, but my first offensive resulted in a 90 day mute

Its not your first offense mate cause you can see its your 6th offense at the end of the proof link.
And you know you have been muted before, lying here isn't going to help you mate.
Valid punishment should not be forgiven.