why are the ScreenShare rules so stupid

[QuickPots]

for example, having an inactive client. i dont understand why you ban for clients and other things that are not even active. somehow you can get a ban with the same duration as doxxing threats by just having an autoclicker on your computer. half of the comm have cheats on their PC........... also why is disabled services considered "bypass attempt"?

 

[FaroukUN1]

services are basically what logs file executions, so without them(most importantly sysmain and prefetch/pcasvc) some important things dont log...
but if you run an autoclicker in instance it is bannable even if you disabled it before launching minecraft
its also called bypass attempt since ur basically wasting staff's time by intentionally disabling a service.
for more info reply to me

 

[FaroukUN1]

but if a staff member didn't fully check ur pc, and only banned you for having "cheats.exe" on your desktop(without running them since the last restart) then your ban is invalid and getting unbanned if you know what to say on the appeal.

 

[brane6666]

I got banned for having an auto clicker open when I reported someone and no logs of me using it in game I still carried out my ban even tho there were no logs or proof that I was using it.

 

[FaroukUN1]

I got banned for having an auto clicker open when I reported someone and no logs of me using it in game I still carried out my ban even tho there were no logs or proof that I was using it.

can u explain more, didnt get the context

 

[FaroukUN1]

if it was executed, its bannable even if u didnt use it.

 

[Your_Death_450]

Read screen share rules bro ik they are bit illogical