No I don't. I just think it was funny how they took that one hour and used it to it's full capacity.If you have proof of any users using hacks during the event, or anywhere in Pika-Network you can always report them at https://pika-network.net/forums/player-reports.150/
Have a great day
You cant really blame the owners, they already did their best. Pika already has NCP and AAC4 added, which AAC is paid. The ban lasting 24hours is a problem, but if we increase it, more people that gets false banned will get banned for longer, and if we decrease the number staff wont have time to reply to ban appeals. AAC is already a great anticheat in my opinion, they block most of the hacks, but the hacked clients are designed to get around them. Plus if the owners were to change the anticheat, which one can they even choose? Leaked AGC that crashes the network with viruses? Free anticheats like PheonixAC and WitherAC that's worse than NCP?that actually is not anyone's fault, it's the anti-cheat's fault, aka the owners who should've change the anti cheat since long time ago, but let's be honest the anti cheat will never caught a hacker, will only caught clean players who lag tf out and gets banned for 24 hours, and when they appeal, they'll reply the appeal after the player's ban already gets expired
AAC is not good IMO. Leaked AGC is also not an option. The main problem isn't detecting auto clicker/reach/velocity. It's detecting bhop/fly and blatant hacks. A 1.5k player server shouldn't use a free anticheat. To be honest, they could buy verus which would completely fix the blatant hacker problem, get rid of most false bans/kicks, and give access to anti-cheat logs. I have no clue why they don't do this.You can't really blame the owners, they already did their best. Pika already has NCP and AAC4 added, which AAC is paid. The ban lasting 24hours is a problem, but if we increase it, more people that get false banned will get banned for longer, and if we decrease the number staff won't have time to reply to ban appeals. AAC is already a great anticheat in my opinion, they block most of the hacks, but the hacked clients are designed to get around them. Plus if the owners were to change the anti-cheat, which one can they even choose? Leaked AGC that crashes the network with viruses? Free anti-cheats like PheonixAC and WitherAC that's worse than NCP?
Wdym a 1.5k player server shouldn't use a free anticheat? They already have AAC added that already blocks most of the hacks, such as the list below:AAC is not good IMO. Leaked AGC is also not an option. The main problem isn't detecting auto clicker/reach/velocity. It's detecting bhop/fly and blatant hacks. A 1.5k player server shouldn't use a free anticheat. To be honest, they could buy verus which would completely fix the blatant hacker problem, get rid of most false bans/kicks, and give access to anti-cheat logs. I have no clue why they don't do this.
PikaNetwork is one of the largest Minecraft server!
Since the day PikaNetwork was formed, back in 2014, we have focused on bringing joy to
the community. We offer many game modes, these being BedWars, Classic SkyBlock, Factions, Kit-PvP,
Lifesteal, OP Factions, OP Lifesteal, OP Prison, OP SkyBlock, Practice, SkyWars and Survival!
Come play at: play.pika-network.net
Have you had a fun time here? Support us by purchasing packages such as ranks, commands, crate keys, and more!