Accepted Forums Possibly give reasons of being denied in Media/Staff Applications.

[TheTrueNova]

Minecraft Username:

thetruenova​

Suggestion:

Possibly give reasons of being denied in Media/Staff Applications.​

Detailed description:

I'm not saying this from experience, but my friend has made a few staff applications and a single Media application and on the Media and I think a single staff application, the explanation for being denied was just 'denied' on it's own. I think if you explain why they were denied they can grow from that and learn what they need to do before reapplying.

I just want to explain that when I say explain, I don't mean explain every detail, it's just explain some things. Say some things you did OK at in the application and some things you should probably look at in the application.​

Reason(s):

I want this idea implemented because I guess I just want people to be told why they were denied other than just 'denied'.​

Example(s):

Someone makes a application for the YouTube rank, and get's denied. They did not have enough subscribers, and were denied for that. On a staff application, they had bad decisions on muting people for things, or they didn't think they would be a good part of the staff team because they said they weren't available for a lot of the time and only an hour a day.​

 

[EA0_2_0_8_]

+1
or you can simply ask for the reason by making a conversation on forum.

 

[Snowyy]

+1 Actually they should say why an application is denied , or why a report is denied , because then players will try to improve what they don’t have right and especially in reports , players need to know why a report is denied because sometimes it feels like the report was right and it’s confusing on why they get denied .

 

[Outscale]

Hello I don't care about this tho


Merry Christmas ya filthy animal and a Happy New Year!

 

[Unawarely]

+1
or you can simply ask for the reason by making a conversation on forum.

I mean they don't really respond to those as much and also it doesn't make sense for them to make a conversation, the denier should just spend 10 seconds writing a sentence for some improvement

 

[Apo2xd]

why a report is denied

I think we do say the reason, aren't we

 

[Sekiro]

+1
im totally not bypassing this annoying filter and blah blah blah

 

[Clxd]

+1 Yes, I was denied for staff a few months back and I think I had a decent application. Some reasoning would be nice

 

[EA0_2_0_8_]

I mean they don't really respond to those as much and also it doesn't make sense for them to make a conversation, the denier should just spend 10 seconds writing a sentence for some improvement

it is just another proposal if this got denied.
But as I said, +1 to this

 

[TheTrueNova]

I think we do say the reason, aren't we

A friend's staff application and youtube application were simply 'denied'. There was no other information besides that.

 

[EA0_2_0_8_]

staff and youtube apply?
you can only own one rank, you can't have <trial><YT>EAnoob Staff

A friend's staff application and youtube application were simply 'denied'. There was no other information besides that.

 

[TheTrueNova]

staff and youtube apply?
you can only own one rank, you can't have <trial><YT>EAnoob Staff

He applied for staff, got denied, and then applied for YT and got denied again.

 

[Sekiro]

He applied for staff, got denied, and then applied for YT and got denied again.

But they didn't said the reason(s) of why he did got denied

 

[Apo2xd]

He applied for staff, got denied, and then applied for YT and got denied again.

he might didn't meet the requirements, Plus you need to read the requirements before applying.

 

[TheTrueNova]

But they didn't said the reason(s) of why he did got denied

Yeah, they didn't say the reason behind it.

this message is here because they wont allow me to post it

 

[TeKkaTi]

+1 This should happen coz many people find it difficult to analyise their application on their own.
(I'll just leave some info about why an application gets denied)
Alright so from experience and learnings I can share some of the following points :
If it is denied, it could mean that you might need to work on maybe your detailing of answers , how you are explaining certain point of views , how your grammar is being used in those sentences.
How much of an effort you are putting into a specific answer can easily be guessed from its way of appearance and vocabulary usage .
Now another possiblity could also be that there is a possiblity that the staff/YT application could have been copied from some where or changed with very minimal changes theryby looking very similar.
Now if you are applying for staff what the administrative team expects from you is to try to find your mistakes and learn from it and improve in your next application thats why a time of 1 month is also given to you to think,reframe and rephrase your application.
Always before submiting you application judge your own application out of 10 and wait for the results to come so then you will also realize where you thought you might have done good but from an admin perspective you might have not given your best so you work on those things again.
Also a pro tip : The longer the better . More details won't reduce your chances, Less details surely will.

 

[Outscale]

A friend's staff application and youtube application were simply 'denied'. There was no other information besides that.

@Apo2xd replied to a post referring to player reports, not applications.

 

[EA0_2_0_8_]

He applied for staff, got denied, and then applied for YT and got denied again.

oh gotcha

 

[EA0_2_0_8_]

+1 This should happen coz many people find it difficult to analyise their application on their own.
(I'll just leave some info about why an application gets denied)
Alright so from experience and learnings I can share some of the following points :
If it is denied, it could mean that you might need to work on maybe your detailing of answers , how you are explaining certain point of views , how your grammar is being used in those sentences.
How much of an effort you are putting into a specific answer can easily be guessed from its way of appearance and vocabulary usage .
Now another possiblity could also be that there is a possiblity that the staff/YT application could have been copied from some where or changed with very minimal changes theryby looking very similar.
Now if you are applying for staff what the administrative team expects from you is to try to find your mistakes and learn from it and improve in your next application thats why a time of 1 month is also given to you to think,reframe and rephrase your application.
Always before submiting you application judge your own application out of 10 and wait for the results to come so then you will also realize where you thought you might have done good but from an admin perspective you might have not given your best so you work on those things again.
Also a pro tip : The longer the better . More details won't reduce your chances, Less details surely will.

good sir

well explained

 

[Ronii_]

+1
or you can simply ask for the reason by making a conversation on forum.

deffinetly easier for everyone if they supplied a reason when they deny you