Denied Global Small revamp of some rules.

[CqmeronO]

Minecraft username:

CqmeronO​

Suggestion:

Small revamp of some rules.​

Detailed description:

Small rework of the rules. Example the screensharing rules. 1 week for inactive modifications is way too short. I think a better approach would be 30 days (inactive modifications), 90 days (active), 30 days (refusal) and other things such as having sysmain disabled (30 days instead of 90.) Therefore if legitimate players like me get banned for SysMain being disabled it isn't 3 months and instead 1, makes players stick for longer especially if they aren't a long term player like me​

Reason(s):

Now this is completely bias because I was banned for something quite strange. But I think that a rework of the rules would help pika network massively. The rules are taken extremely seriously and there is a lot of stuff to read about it. The rules work well however they punish legitimate players for an extreme length and rule breakers for less. It is annoying as I play pika way too much and it's unhealthy and I hate it. But I have fun and getting banned for something I've never heard of for 90 days when I could have refused the whole thing and got 30 days is crazy.​

Example(s):

I was banned for having SysMain disabled during my screenshare since it overheats my pc. (I recently figured that out) and it is a 90 DAY BAN. If I actually was cheating and had inactive modifications it would have been 7 DAYS. I don't understand why a feature that causes performance issues being disabled gets you a 90day ban but having hacks on your desktop or in files gets you a week? And even then its a 30 day ban for refusing and actually getting caught with hacks (not too sure on the second one, its either 30 or 90)
This is completely bias. It should not be a 90 day ban for SysMain, even staff agree!!!​

 

[B1ueRay]

totally disagree infact i dont even agree with 90 days for second offense for admitting to cheating. its way too high

 

[Arrly]

Hello CqmeronO,

Thank you for your interest in creating a suggestion to improve the server. We are always doing our best to make the server a better place for everyone.
However, we have eventually decided to deny your suggestion due to the following reason(s):

• Most people already consider it harsh to ban for inactive modifications as these were not proven to have been used on the server. Increasing the punishment for these would not make a positive difference.
• Disabling certain services falls under attempting to bypass. If the punishment for this rule was lighter, people would be equally inclined to attempt to bypass and admit or refuse, which would completely defeat the purpose of admitting or refusing in the first place.
• As a long-term player, you should have read and understood the rules and their explanations. It's your responsibility for failing to do so.

For your reference, here is a link to our suggestion guidelines → PikaNetwork Suggestion Guidelines.
Please make sure to read and understand them before suggesting again.

We also advise you to use our Thread Search Feature to look for (similar) already made suggestions and upvote them instead.

​

Have fun playing on PikaNetwork!