Denied Practice Public chat bans on practice

[Krekkers]

Suggestion:

Public chat bans on practice​

Detailed description:

Dont we all hate cheaters.
well if you dont just leave.
leave.
go then.
now all the cheater haters are left.

What would you do if you see someone you have beaten in a fight thier name if they cheated.
well i have some good and bad points of this.

Good:
1 shame- shame on them they shouldnt have been cheating.
2 staff credit- you know if a cheater got banned and if your report was being looked at makes the staff team feel more present.
3 you can see what they got banned for.
bad:
1 console bans are rapid.
2 it can get irritating.
3 false bans.

personaly i hate cheaters and the shame of being falsebanned is there.

i hope this is being considerd a feature.

- krekkers​

Reason(s):

less hackers by feeling shame like other servers​

Example(s):

Pikachu`s lightning striked (name) and he got banned.​

 

[JerryMine]

Actually, the hackers won't feel shamed because their face is thicc enough to handle it. Even worse, they can just plug off their face and get a new one.

What I think about this is, we need to know if the hacker is banned or he went offline.

 

[Luppeeyz]

So the main point of this thread is just about turning the punishment to be published? The owners could barely change that in their anticheat - punishment plugins config file

 

[voodootje0]

Hey Krekkers,​

Thank you for your interest by creating a suggestion for PikaNetwork.​

Unfortunately, we do not think this suggestion will fit into PikaNetwork. So we will be denying your suggestion​

​

Have a good time on PikaNetwork!​

Best regards,
voodootje0