Global evidence of execution on SS

[Aeserious]

Minecraft username:

FaroukUN​

Suggestion:

evidence of execution on SS​

Detailed description:

when staff suspect someone is cheating they go ahead and screenshare him, then the screensharer looks for anything suspecious but when he finds(for example) a desktop icon called "vapev4.exe" he immediately bans for it.
the staff doesn't look for a proof that the client was injected/executed

basically the suggestion is for staff to provide evidence of execution in a screenshare.​

Reason(s):

some people use ghost clients for testing or to play with them on other servers, or screensharing with them. and most of their strings are hard to delete anyway.​

 

[Tihispap]

Staff members are trained to recognize illegal modifications and ban accordingly. They do not require more evidence when banning.
Downvote

 

[aeserior]

I can understand where you're coming from, but evidence is not publicly available at all and screensharers aren't required to prove the execution for ghost clients, and the reason behind is that ghost clients are designed to be untraceable, making it nearly impossible to prove it was executed. But that doesn't mean SS verified aren't required to prove execution of other files, so we always recommend appealing because sometimes the screensharer can also make a mistake/not follow the proper procedures.

 

[Aeserious]

I can understand where you're coming from, but evidence is not publicly available at all and screensharers aren't required to prove the execution for ghost clients, and the reason behind is that ghost clients are designed to be untraceable, making it nearly impossible to prove it was executed. But that doesn't mean SS verified aren't required to prove execution of other files, so we always recommend appealing because sometimes the screensharer can also make a mistake/not follow the proper procedures.

well on other competetive servers/communities where ssing exists it is mandetory, for example pika ranked bedwars. when i asked the SS manager about this he told me that he got banned without evidence of execution since he uses a ghost client to train other screensharers.
and ghost clients are not perfect and the proof is that they get caught. thank you

 

[Aeserious]

Staff members are trained to recognize illegal modifications and ban accordingly. They do not require more evidence when banning.
Downvote

it really does as i mentioned earlier, and half screensharing experience is the evidence...