Accepted Global AntiCheat Reports

[Disaalt]

Minecraft Username

disaalt​

Suggestion:

AntiCheat Reports​

Detailed description:

Hey guys,
Haven't made a suggestion in a while but the server is probs already the main headquarters for hackers but I'm just trying to help the community a bit.

Today I am talking about AntiCheat reports.

What are AntiCheat reports?
well, its reports but you let the anticheat do it.

AntiCheat reports are a kind of report that is mainly used for hackers. What we do is we type out a command, followed by a username and a reason. Something like /acreport Disaalt fly.

What then happens is the anticheat gets the report, runs all the checks on the player (AntiKnockback check, KillAura check, scaffold checks) and trys to see if the player is hacking or not. If he is hacking, ban him. If he is suspected, and has past criminal records, notify a staff member. If he is legit just leave him.

Wait but Disaalt ur so dumb many people say that people can abuse the system!
Ok

You cant really abuse the system if it is ran through the Anticheat itself. I mean, if you false report a player for using killaura, and the anticheat checks if the player is using it, but the player wasn't, then the anticheat just leaves the report. It only notify staff if the player has sketchy hacks like reach and autoclicker.

IF it really can be abused, just make a rule about it or make a 10 min cooldown.

Also, if the staff member DOESNT WANT TO BE STORMED BY ALERTS EVERY 5 SECONDS make an /alert command

Why don't we just report on the forums?
why tho

It's much simpler and faster. This type of report is not intended to report people for uh spamming/flooding/swearing in chat. Its only for hackers. I know many people have suggested a /report command and got denied before, but all I'm asking is an anticheat report command cmon @JustThiemo I know u can do that right, I mean i could do it
Also, it will actually make the hacker-ban-rates higher because the anticheat is FOCUSING on 1 single person.

btw, can I suggest that we need better checks for the anticheat, i mean 5 godbridgers in 1 game thats possible i guess​

Reason(s):

1. im tired of recording, like all my disk space is all used for recording why
2. anticheat doesn't detect ANY HACKS MAN
3. please +1 because this is my 2nd suggestion in my whole entire life man​

Example(s):

watchdoge has it i guess .-.​

 

[Silver Wing]

+1

 

[Disaalt]

+1

thank

 

[keiko]

+1

 

[rocke6161]

+1

 

[Disaalt]

+1

+1

thank x2

 

[Silver Wing]

Dont say thank its a really good suggestion

 

[rocke6161]

lez hope it gets accepted

 

[Silver Wing]

ye but what if it doesn't??

 

[Makinjo]

+1

 

[EA0_2_0_8_]

[BGCOLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]+1[/BGCOLOR]
well organized suggestion, well done. But rip for dev, he need to be locked in basement and code for ur suggestion lolXD


Good afternoon,
0208

 

[moxxy17]

Obviously, it will be a +1 from everyone.
But since 2015 there hasn't been a proper pika anti-cheat.
I severely doubt that they are going to get a working anti-cheat. The one that they apparently added to practice, doesn't even ban, and you can bypass with so many clients. In BW and SW too. I don't think JustThiemo can develop an anti-cheat, if however, I am wrong, make an anti-cheat and make it so instead of banning legit players, it starts banning fly hackers and hackers that are using kill aura. I doubt it though, they haven't been capable of making an anti-cheat for years, won't change now.

 

[EA0_2_0_8_]

@trustjustthiemo and the time before they just working on jartex, now finally do things in pika

 

[moxxy17]

@trustjustthiemo and the time before they just working on jartex, now finally do things in pika

you realize it's been 7 years and there hasn't been an anti-cheat.
nothing's going to happen. i've been here when they have said we are working on it, and they are making a anti-cheat and they are trying their best, but they just aren't.
pika is not as important to owners/thiemo as jartex.

 

[TeKkaTi]

+1

 

[EA0_2_0_8_]

pika is not as important to owners/thiemo as jartex.

+1 for this sentence, jartex has developed so quickly, but Pika recently has do so much update, skyawrs, bedwar, parctise, prison etc.... but there still have a long road for dev to do inpika

 

[markiii]

+1

 

[UpperGround]

+1

 

[Disaalt]

+1 for this sentence, jartex has developed so quickly, but Pika recently has do so much update, skyawrs, bedwar, parctise, prison etc.... but there still have a long road for dev to do inpika

obviously not lmao. They only need to change maps, then they just control c jartex files and copy em straight in pika

 

[EA0_2_0_8_]

obviously not lmao. They only need to change maps, then they just control c jartex files and copy em straight in pika

aggree