this is bannable right??

[StrexDM]

he publicly chat privacy content.

 

[TsT_AnkushGaming]

Pretty sure it is bannable. However, since the player was nicked, and no /realname is provided, this cannot be considered valid evidence.

 

[EternalGuard]

Hey even if its banneble you always need to do /realname as the players are nicked by /realname we can find out who exactly was that and with new feature you can also provide /realname proof in 2nd screenshot

 

[StrexDM]

Hey even if its banneble you always need to do /realname as the players are nicked by /realname we can find out who exactly was that and with new feature you can also provide /realname proof in 2nd screenshot

Theres a name Salicon and his/her pure name is Salicon, tysm for feedback

 

[EternalGuard]

Theres a name Salicon and his/her pure name is Salicon, tysm for feedback

thats not how it works even if i do /nick EternalGuard and say some punishible thing and the player who reported me didnt do /realname i wont be punishied always remember to do /realname when the player is nicked to know if the player is nicked or not you can see [**] before the players name if they are nicked