Global Reduce Ban Time for Auto Clicker (1st)

[VoidAxe]

Minecraft username:

VoidGodX​

Suggestion:

Reduce Ban Time for Auto Clicker (1st)​

Detailed description:

Currently, the punishment for using an auto clicker is a 90-day ban regardless of whether it is a first or repeated offence. I suggest adjusting this system so that the first offence results in a 30-day ban, while the second offence remains at 90 days. This creates a more balanced punishment system that still discourages rule-breaking but allows some leniency for first-time cases.​

Reason(s):

There are situations where players may get flagged or banned without intentionally using third-party auto clicker software. For example, some players may place a physical object on their mouse to hold down clicks, or use in-game mechanics such as toggle/hold attack features available in newer versions. While these actions may still violate the rules, they are not always done with malicious intent or external tools.
Reducing the first offence ban duration would make the system fairer and give players a chance to correct their behavior, while still maintaining strict punishment for repeat offenders.​

Example(s):

• A player places a small weight on their mouse to hold down the click while AFK farming, without using any external software.
• A player uses built-in game settings like toggle/hold attack and unintentionally.
• A new or unaware player gets banned for the first time without fully understanding the rules.

 

[EpicMiner001]

-1 The system already gives a second chance , but punishments like this are strict for a reason—to keep things fair and discourage abuse. Lowering it would just make rule-breaking less serious, and consistency matters more than leniency here.

 

[VoidAxe]

-1 The system already gives a second chance , but punishments like this are strict for a reason—to keep things fair and discourage abuse. Lowering it would just make rule-breaking less serious, and consistency matters more than leniency here.

I understand your point, and I agree that punishments need to be strict to keep the game fair. I’m not suggesting reducing punishments for all types of cheating. For serious cheats like x-ray, killaura, aimassist or other unfair advantages, a 90-day ban is completely justified and should stay as it is.

My suggestion is only for auto clicker-related cases, which are sometimes less clear-cut. There are situations where players don’t use any external software and still get flagged (like holding click, placing weight on the mouse, or using in-game mechanics). Because of that, a slightly reduced punishment for the first offence (30 days) would be more reasonable, while still keeping the 90-day ban for repeat offences.

 

[FaroukUN1]

I understand your point, and I agree that punishments need to be strict to keep the game fair. I’m not suggesting reducing punishments for all types of cheating. For serious cheats like x-ray, killaura, aimassist or other unfair advantages, a 90-day ban is completely justified and should stay as it is.

My suggestion is only for auto clicker-related cases, which are sometimes less clear-cut. There are situations where players don’t use any external software and still get flagged (like holding click, placing weight on the mouse, or using in-game mechanics). Because of that, a slightly reduced punishment for the first offence (30 days) would be more reasonable, while still keeping the 90-day ban for repeat offences.

no autoclicking is a severe offense
you cant imagine the differance in pvp between a legit 18cps player and a 8cps autoclicker its crazy advantage.
also dont use AI -1

 

[MelloGamesYT]

-1
In anyway, autoclickers count as cheats.

 

[EpicMiner001]

I understand your point, and I agree that punishments need to be strict to keep the game fair. I’m not suggesting reducing punishments for all types of cheating. For serious cheats like x-ray, killaura, aimassist or other unfair advantages, a 90-day ban is completely justified and should stay as it is.

My suggestion is only for auto clicker-related cases, which are sometimes less clear-cut. There are situations where players don’t use any external software and still get flagged (like holding click, placing weight on the mouse, or using in-game mechanics). Because of that, a slightly reduced punishment for the first offence (30 days) would be more reasonable, while still keeping the 90-day ban for repeat offences.

The system already allows a second chance—if a player isn’t actually using an auto clicker, they can submit a punishment appeal. First-time bans aren’t automatically reduced, but wrongful cases can be reviewed there.